DIASPORA CANNOT IGNORE REALITIES AND TRANSPARENCY

It is always interesting to read some one speak on his dreams ,Even you do not agree with him. I met  S. V. Kirubaharan at Geneva and thorn in our side but he made few  points about Diaspora Tamil web writers .They are the scum of the Tamil Diaspora at present  includes Tamilnet.–Noel Nadesan

By S. V. Kirubaharan, France

I humbly feel that if we don’t share our views openly and honestly, there is no use talking about unity. Therefore, I will be frank and honest.

We Tamils from the North East or Eelam Tamils have had many rises and falls – the non violent struggle, the armed struggle in self-defence which came to a halt in May 2009 – the debacle of Mullivaigzhal.

We were taken for a ride by all the aggressive rulers in Ceylon/Sri Lanka, so we are not ready to trust anyone, including our own kith and kin. This is our present dilemma.

Therefore it appears that no viable or successful cooperation among us is possible and this is the very weakness of which the Sri Lankan government is taking maximum advantage. There are many other reasons making us feeble.

 From the very beginning, so-called political leaders have lacked long term political vision.

 We had neither political allies nor enemies among the Sri Lanka/Ceylon rulers.

 We never worked to build-up solidarity among the non-political people in the South. A few Tamil entrepreneurs did, but for their personal benefits rather than for the benefit of our nation.

This solidarity could have been achieved on cultural, religious and humanist levels. This is one of the lessons that we learned from other independence struggles including South Sudan.

 In our vocabulary there is no place for ‘give and take’ policy.

 Throughout history we facilitated and energised the so-called traitors. No path was sought to encourage them to rectify their mistakes. As a result they became the vanguard of the Sri Lankan rulers.

 After the fall of the USSR, independence struggles emerged. But our struggle continued with more sad stories rather than any reasonable success. This is to say that we missed a few opportunities.

 In a broad sense, we Eelam Tamils were the patients, physicians, surgeons and found our own therapy for our illnesses. This is how we were approaching our long bloody political struggle and even today some of us are not ready to share leadership and thoughts with trusted friends, colleagues, and neighbours.

 The list goes on…………

Aggressor’s task made easy

The majority of the diaspora supporting the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam – LTTE in the past are today split into many groups. This makes the aggressor’s task very easy. Many are with old thinking with a different approach; a few are with old thinking and some work on completely new phenomena and new approaches.

There is an advantage in having old thinking with a new approach, but is it right to have completely new thinking and a new approach? Or even having only the old thinking? The new thinking is sort of starting from scratch. It has its own shortcomings. The old thinking needs to be followed methodically to gain international support.

Our pathetic history has taught us that the Sri Lankan rulers capitalise on our political mistakes. We have suffered enough through our mistakes.

Creators of new Tamil political parties and organisations have learned nothing from our history or from the attitude of the Sri Lankan rulers.

Some Tamil-owned English and Tamil media in foreign countries are failing to accept realities. They are censoring many realities, for example even the fact that the LTTE Leader Pirapaharan stated that friendship with India should be renewed. Those exaggerating media prefer to launch our people into more disasters. These media do nothing productively. If they publish from the ground and face the consequences, we can recommend them for bravery and leadership. But they are hiding in the democratic countries and motivating others to commit suicide or face mass murder. Before May 2009, the combatants were living with people and guiding the struggle and they sacrificed themselves too.

The terminologies ‘right to self-determination’ and ‘nationalism’ are not only for the Eelam Tamils. They are for every ethnic group. Generally when we talk of politics, we tend to ignore other human beings. The terms ‘right to self-determination’ and ‘nationalism’ should not be loosely used by bankrupt political parties and others.

The breakaway group from the Tamil National Alliance – TNA, initially gave a pretext for breaking away – two of their personalities were not given the opportunity to contest the election on a TNA ticket. Later they said that policy differences on ‘right to self-determination’ were the cause of their break-away. This pure egoism and their pessimistic politics make others doubt whether they function in collaboration with the present regime!

I can give another example which took place in June and September 2007, in Zurich and Geneva. There were two seminars or conferences organised lavishly with the help of international NGOs. The motive of the organisers was to inform the outsiders that they were the diaspora leaders of the Eelam struggle! In other words, the organisers were very keen to identify themselves to the outsiders that they were the “Porte-parole of Vanni”.

Where are they today? When the coffer seems empty, some are keeping away from these issues, a few became businessmen overnight and some hide behind the curtains of new political phenomena, doing more damage to the unity of the diaspora.

As far as biased media is concerned, I can give two good examples of news items which appeared during the last 19th session of the Human Rights Council. One was that when a group of people handed over an appeal to an Officer in the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, it was published in the media saying that the appeal was handed over to Ms Navaneethampillai, the High Commissioner for Human Rights!

Another manipulated news item with a few posed photographs taken within the UN building was published in a few media by a particular organisation claiming that they were doing an ardent task in the UN Human Rights Council. These bogus news items misled and misinformed the public. This is not the way the diaspora organisations should work.

Sri Lanka defeated in the international front

On the international front Sri Lanka has been defeated several times. These were the result of well coordinated tasks undertaken by many countries, International NGOs, prominent persons, members of civil society including human rights defenders from the South and veteran Tamil diaspora organisations.

Sri Lanka lost its seat in the UN Human Rights Council, GSP plus trade concessions were withdrawn by the European Union, the UN Secretary General appointed the panel on Sri Lanka, Rajapaksa’s doomed visit to UK, withdrawal of military personnel who were accused of war crimes from the Sri Lankan embassies, Channel 4 programmes and the resolution in the 19th session of UN HRC are a few good examples.

Since 22 March 2012, the superpower USA and the regional powers India, European Union and many other countries have shown us the right path and laid the right foundations for a paradigm shift towards peace with justice and dignity.

It is not easy for everyone, especially pessimists and the bankrupt politicians to understand this strong foundation. We missed a few opportunities in the past and more than 200,000 people have sacrificed their lives and many more have lost livelihoods, assets, respect, self-dignity, etc

Some Tamil-owned diaspora media and opportunists talk daily about the present colonisation, buddhistisation, sinhalisation and militarization in the North and East, but they are silent about what the right remedy can be. It seems that they are ready to allow free flow of all these, unrealistically hoping to achieve something which has no support of the international community. Can any sensible person allow further disaster to come to our nation? If so, in another few years we Eelam Tamils will remain as a people only in documents but not physically.

Cannot gamble anymore

A realist perspective always considers a common goal whereas pessimists give prominence to their ego.

Even though many of us come from different sectors, we could work on a policy of ‘Unity within diversity’. In Tamil, there is a proverb that says ‘if the wall remains you can do your drawings’. (Suwaar irunthalthan chithiram varyalam)

When it comes to matters concerning our Nation, we can no longer gamble or build-up castles in the air. We should be able to go with the wind of the globe. In other words, a deviation of our path is a must to reach our destiny.

Rather than losing any more lives and land, let us carefully articulate our diplomatic approach. An immediate interim solution will show the right path to a permanent solution. This is the present wind of the globe. Let us unite to save our people and our land.

Well coordinated action with the support of the international community, NGOs and others will bring us peace, justice with dignity. This should not be undermined and misled by bankrupt politicians, unprofessional media and so-called researchers.

To achieve this task we need to work on two fronts. One should be diplomatically and internationally. The second one can be with masses, I mean with Eelam and other Tamils around the globe. This needs transparency and to be based on realities rather than emotions and exaggeration.

Sri Lanka lobbyists

If we observe and analyse the propaganda of the Sri Lanka lobbyists, we can see that they talk much about the resettlement of IDPs and rehabilitation or release of ex-combatants. But they are silent about the thousands of ex-combatants who surrendered and the IDPs who were raped, killed and disappeared. This is their weakness and we need a coordinated lobby on these affairs, with the help of big powers.

The Tamil homeland/Tamil Kingdom in the Island existed long before the arrival of the colonial powers. Some of us think that we have had political problems only since independence in 1948. This is totally wrong!

Both the Donoughmore Commission in 1927-1931 and Lord Soulbury’s Commission/constitution in 1947 ignored the aspirations of Eelam Tamils.

There were constitutional reforms after 1948, but nothing accommodated any solution to the grievances of Eelam Tamils. But it was portrayed to the outside world, that there was only a small group of Tamils against the rule of the numerical majority, the Singhalese. All this has to be fought diplomatically in international forums.

It is still not too late for us to build-up solidarity among the people in the South, on cultural, religious and humanist levels. This is with the long term vision of both nations, living side by side peacefully. Also we need to work with our Muslim and plantation Tamil brothers and sisters.

Out of any people struggling in exercise of their right to self-determination, we Eelam Tamils have the maximum number of people (diaspora) internationally. But our past experience has taught us that we cannot and should not proceed alone any longer. Now we see a green light from the regional and global powers – India and USA.

If we are serious in our task – saving our land and people, we need to share our thoughts and future vision with these powers. Sri Lanka may have won the so called war on terrorism but not the diplomatic war in the international front.

Hate among us continues to damage our nation. It is not the dream or intention of any of us. Day by day, year by year, generation by generation, this is how each of us has contributed to the destruction of our nation. We must bring this to an end. Now we are at the verge of losing everything. We will have to open our eyes to see what is happening to our language, our culture, our nation and our land. Let us realise and admit our mistakes. We can’t change the past, but if we maintain at least the policy of ‘Unity within diversity’, we might or can change the future. Let us have unity within diversity and face the challenges in safeguarding our people and our home land. Time is running out.

Posted in Uncategorized | மறுமொழியவும்

Brain Tumors and Mobile Telephones

Written by Dr Harold Gunatillake- Health writer

Cell phones emit radiofrequency energy, and their constant usage close to your ear has raised suspicion that the increasing brain tumors, such as gliomas meningiomas especially among youth and adolescence could be linked to such non-ionic radiation.

The scare of acquiring brain tumors and its link with the use of mobile cell phones has been dispelled by some recent studies.

A EUROPEAN study involving nearly 1000 participants has found no link between mobile phone use and brain tumors among children and adolescents, a group that may be particularly sensitive to phone emissions.

A study, published in the Journal of the national Cancer Institute revealed the concerns of younger individuals brains being more vulnerable to adverse health effects of constantly using cell phones and after effects of exposure to radiation.

Research has revealed that there is no increase in brain tumors among children in the US and many parts of Europe who constantly are using mobile phones and from the resulting emissions. It is also observed that most youths start to use mobile phones quite young do absorb twice the amount of cellphone energy more than adults.

The Interphone Study
A 13-country study of adults, released last year, suggested that there was no increased brain-cancer risk for mobile phone users compared with non-users. However, the heaviest users appeared to have a slightly increased risk of a certain type of brain cancer.

Gliomas linked to cell phones
There was some indication that an increase numbers in glioma tumors in the brain among heavy users of cell phones. However, this relationship is disputed, and the interphone researchers considered this finding inconclusive.

There are still three main reasons why people are concerned that constant use of cell phones may cause certain types of cancers.

1) The number of cell phone uses world- wide has increased. And the incidence of brain cancer tumors has also increased.

2) Over time, the numbers of cell phone calls per day, the length of each call, and the duration of uses of cell phones have increased and further the technology also has undergone substantial changes.

3) These cell phones emit radio-frequency energy which is a form of non-ionizing radiation, and when held against the body tissues absorb energy. Potential health effects of radiofrequency exposure from cell phones, radar, satellite stations, microwave ovens, and other sources have been studied for many years.

Acoustic neuroma
Acoustic neuromas originate in the middle ear region from the main nerve that runs close with the ear.
A pooled analysis of data from Interphone investigators from Denmark, Finland, Norway, Sweden, and the United Kingdom did not find relationships between the risk of acoustic neuroma and the duration of cell phone use, cumulative hours of use, or number of calls; however, the risk of a tumor on the same side of the head as the reported phone use was higher among persons who had used a cell phone for 10 years or more. A Swedish case-control study reported similar findings, but a Danish case-control study showed no increased risk in long-term (10 years or more) cell phone users compared with short-term users, and no increase in the incidence of tumors on the side of the head where the phone was usually held. Patients with a tumor on one side of their head might be more likely to report phone use on that side.

Radiofrequency energy is a form of electromagnetic radiation. There are two types: ionizing (x-rays, radon, cosmic rays) and non-ionizing (radio-frequency, extremely low frequency or power frequency). Ionizing radiation from x-rays can cause cancer. Mobile phones emit non-ionizing radiation, which has enough energy to cause atoms in a molecule to vibrate, but not enough to remove electrons. Sound waves and visible light waves are other examples of non- ionizing radiation. So far, there is no evidence that non-ionizing radiation emitted from cell phones have caused cancer risk.

More details
When you call somebody from a cell phone, the antenna sends signals to the nearest base station antenna. The base station, then call through a switching center to transfer the call to the receiver.

The radiofrequency energy affects your body in many ways:

The number and duration of calls
The amount of cell phone traffic at a given time
The distance from the nearest base station
The quality of the cellular transmission
The size of the handset
For older phones, how far the antenna is extended
Whether or not a hands-free device is used

There are beneficial effects from radiofrequency energy, such as when used for heating, a form of this is used by microwave ovens. High doses of this energy could cause localized tissue heating. Low dosage equipment is used by health personal and physiotherapists to relieve chronic recurrent lower backaches and degenerative cervical (neck) problems,
such as cervical spondylitis. The level of radiofrequency energy used in cell phones is so minimal that it cannot cause sufficient het to damage human tissues.

It has been observed that there had been no adverse effects on U.S. Navy electronics technicians or fire control technicians working in electromagnetic pulse test program, cellular phone manufacturing workers, or Navy personnel with a high probability of exposure to radar.

It has been shown that radiofrequency energy does not appear to result in damage to DNA. To date, studies of rodents exposed to radiofrequency radiation provide no clear or consistent evidence that neither this type of radiation causes cancer, nor that it enhances the carcinogenicity of known chemical carcinogens.

Conclusions

The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), a component of the World Health Organization, has recently classified radiofrequency fields as “possibly carcinogenic to humans,” based on limited evidence from human studies, limited evidence from studies of radiofrequency and carcinogenicity in rodents, and weak mechanistic evidence (from studies of geno-toxicity, effects on immune function, gene and protein expression, cell signaling, oxidative stress, and apoptosis, along with studies of the possible effects of radiofrequency energy on the blood-brain barrier).

The American Cancer Society states that most studies to date have not found an association between cell phone use and development of tumors. However, results from these studies have been limited by the length of follow-up, changing patterns of cell phone usage and technology, lack of study of children, and methods for measuring cell phone use. Possible cancer risks of cell phone exposure should continue to be evaluated using high-quality methodological approaches, particularly in relation to use in childhood and adolescence and longer-term use.

(Some reference: National Cancer Institute fact sheet- reviewed 06/23/2011)

Posted in Uncategorized | மறுமொழியவும்

High Blood Pressure, a silent killer

Written by Dr Harold Gunatillake- FRCS, MBBS Cey, Academy of Medicine, Singapore
The normal blood pressure for an adult male is considered to be approximately; systolic 130mm Hg. and diastolic within a range from 60-80mg.Hg. For an adult female the readings are approximately, systolic 120mm. Hg and diastolic, as for men, range between 60 to 80 mm. Hg (Hg stands for mercury). These respective figures should not change with age as was once thought.
When you are young and healthy, the blood vessels (arteries) seem to stretch, expand, and elastic. In such a situation the heart can pump blood without against much peripheral resistance. How many of us continue to have such a situation to boast of a normal blood pressure till late in life. We damage our natural organs, blood vessels, tissues, including the skin unknowingly, by not doing the right things during youth and adult life. Smoking, stress, lack of exercise, obesity, lifestyle diseases like diabetes, consuming high saturated fatty foods, all become responsible for this damage to the arteries, organs and tissues.
The arteries in the body gradually thicken and harden with age. This process is called “Arteriosclerosis”. Damage caused as mentioned above may result in addition to natural thickening, narrowing, and plaque formation within the vessels causing high blood pressure, heart disease, stroke, peripheral vascular disease, among others.
Whatever, your lifestyle has been, due to genetic reasons alone, high blood pressure will catch up with most people who live into older age. Blood pressure is the force of blood pressing against the walls of your arteries. When it’s too high, it raises the heart’s workload and can cause serious damage to the arteries. Over time, uncontrolled high blood pressure increases the risk of heart disease, stroke, and kidney disease.
Increase of blood pressure is an insidious and slow process, meaning the body gets accustomed to live without symptoms until breakdown. Over time, uncontrolled high blood pressure increases the risk of chronic diseases mentioned earlier. It has no outside symptoms for a long time. Internally, it quietly damages the heart, lungs, blood vessels, brain and kidneys, if neglected. Ultimately, it triggers a heart attack or stroke.
It is stressed that after the age of 40 years, it is a good idea for health reasons, see your doctor and check your blood pressure. You may also purchase a digital blood pressure apparatus from the pharmacy, and check yourself regularly.
Home monitoring makes sense if you have high blood pressure.
Your blood pressure changes from hour to hour, sometimes even minute to minute. It jumps around so much that you are more likely to get a good sense of your blood pressure if you check it at home rather than in the doctor’s office.

Just a few of the things that can influence your blood pressure:
• standing up from a chair
• watching an exciting show on television
• eating a meal
• listening to soothing music
• Stress and anxiety
• The time of day
• Certain medications, such as cough mixtures
• Immediately after exercise

In fact, the American Heart Association (AHA), American Society of Hypertension, and Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association urge people with high blood pressure, or at high risk for developing it, to own a blood pressure apparatus to check BP yourself.
There are many good reasons to follow their advice. Taking your blood pressure at home allows you to:
• You are relaxed and your blood pressure will be real. Up to 20% of people diagnosed with high blood pressure have white-coat hypertension. This is a temporary spike in blood pressure brought on by the stress of trekking to and seeing a doctor. Still others have what’s called masked hypertension—normal blood pressure in the doctor’s office but high blood pressure everywhere else
• At home you could regularly check the pressure unlike making an appointment with your doctor solely for the purpose of checking your blood pressure.
• About 60% of people with diabetes have high blood pressure, and it is mandatory to self-check the blood pressure at home regularly.
Prehypertension
Most people over the age of 40 years are pre-hypertensive. This means that their blood pressures are consistently just above the normal level (described above). People in this range have twice the risk of developing heart disease than those with a lower reading. You may need only lifestyle changes without medication if you belong to this category.
Hypertensive crisis
As mentioned earlier the process of high blood pressure is insidious and when it reaches 180/110 and higher you may have a hypertensive crisis. If you feel you are dizzy, breathless, anxious, rest immediately. Get the ambulance and go to hospital immediately. In the crisis situation you can get stroke, heart attack, kidney damage, or loss of consciousness. Earlier stage you may get a severe headache, nosebleeds and feeling short of breath. Avoid getting into this situation as the blood pressure of the rest of your family will also be at stake.
Eat less salt
Salt which contains sodium is water retentive and can raise blood pressure due to greater burden on the heart. One should eat less than 1,500 milligrams of sodium per day. Always check the food labels. Most processed foods are heavy on salt. Cheese, canned soups, dry fish, and too much added salt into curries are other situations.
Excess alcohol
Having a drink a day will relax your nerves and arteries. Drinking too much alcohol can increase your blood pressure. One should not drink more than 12-ounces beer, four ounces of wine, and 1.5 ounces of spirits.
Excess caffeine
Drinking many cups of coffee a day can increase your blood pressure. Your safe limit is one or two cups a day. As one gets older coffee is recommended, supposed to stimulate brain cells and delays Alzheimer’s disease.
Obesity
Being overweight places a strain on your heart and increases the chance of getting high blood pressure. You need to cut your fatty foods, added sugars, and stick to a Mediterranean type of diet with fruits, vegetables and less meat. Daily walk and other exercises burn calories. The DASH diet also helps to lower your blood pressure.
Medicines
Avoid cold and flu medicine that contains decongestants, if possible. They increase your blood pressure. Anti-inflammatory drugs taken for arthritis may increase your blood pressure. Steroids, appetite suppressants, birth control pills and some anti-depressants can raise your blood pressure.
Omega 3 fish oil tends to soft arteries and may lower the blood pressure
Exercise
Any form of exercise, like bicycling, walking briskly, jogging, for one hour a day will burn sufficient calories and also bring down the blood pressure due to a condition called, ”vasodilatation”.
Medication for hypertension
Your doctor may put you on a diuretic to pass more urine and sodium to lower your blood pressure.
Beta-blockers
Beta-blockers work by slowing the heart rate. Your doctor will put you on a beta-blocker if in addition to high blood pressure your heart rate is rapid, over 80 beats / minute. They are also used in abnormal heart rate called arrhythmia. They may cause insomnia, dizziness, fatigue, cold extremities, especially during winter months, and erectile dysfunction, as side effects.
ACE inhibitors
Invariably, older people with high blood pressure are put on this medication to reduce the pressure. A chemical called “angiotensin 11 secreted by the kidneys, makes blood vessels contract, narrow and increase the blood pressure. ACE inhibitors, reduces the chemical and relaxes and open the arteries and lower the blood pressure.
The other kind of medication ARBs (angiotensin 11 Receptor Blockers) block receptors for angiotensin and lowers the blood pressure.
ACE inhibitors and ARBs are specially given for those people who suffer from early kidney failure with high blood pressure and diabetes.
Calcium channel blockers
This medication slows the movement of calcium into the cells of the heart and blood vessels. Calcium causes stronger heart muscle contractions.
These drugs have their side effects such as, heart palpitations, dizziness, constipation, and ankle swelling. Always take them with food and avoid grapefruit juices and alcohol because of possible interactions.
Vasodilators
There are other medications to relax the peripheral arteries to reduce the blood pressure. They are called vasodilators.
Your doctor will prescribe the right combination of anti-hypertensive drugs for you. If you get side effects the doctor may change the medication.
The bottom line is –do not neglect taking your medication and anticipate a heart attack, or stroke. Never take alcohol at the time of taking the medication.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 மறுமொழி

Rwanda – Reconciliation Process.

Source:
Reconciliation Theology:
Rwanda compared to South Africa and is there any application to Australia?
A research project by Alan Nichols
Funded by the Australia Research Theology Foundation
August 2011

So in 1999 the Government developed the concept of a National Unity and Reconciliation Commission. Law 3/1999 of March 12, 1999, stated the purpose of the Commission was “to prepare and facilitate national debate at the national level aimed at promoting the national Unity and Reconciliation of Rwandans.”
It was not based on the model of the South African Trust and Reconciliation Commission, which offered amnesty to perpetrators of apartheid provided they told the truth and confessed. It would be based on pursuing justice at the same time as reconciliation. So determined were the Rwandan Government not to follow the South African model they rejected the offer of Archbishop Desmond Tutu, chairman of the South African Commission, to visit Rwanda and help.
*
During the period when the National Unity and Reconciliation Commission was being considered, the Government set up in 1996 special chambers in “the Court of First Instance” to prosecute perpetrators of genocide at the local village level. These were called ‘gacaca trials’ from an ancient Rwandan custom of villages electing local people to judge matters of local disturbance, local theft, petty stealing, etc.
Mary, a local gacaca judge in Gahini
By 2000, only six thousand cases had been prosecuted, out of about 100,000 men in gaol. Gacaca was intended to show the truth of what happened, to eradicate the culture of impunity, to speed up the prosecutions for the crime of genocide, and to reconcile the people. So more judges were appointed and trained; witnesses were encouraged to come forward; by 2002, 12,000 files had been prepared, 4880 had been listed for hearing, 376 were on remand and 84 had been found guilty. In 2007 gacaca trials were suspended because of threats against some witnesses and some judges, and the process was overhauled. In 2011 the trials have still not been completed.

There was much less talk about forgiveness offered by victims than in the South African experience, and much more about telling the truth, acknowledging guilt, showing remorse, offering reparations, and then living together.

In 2011, what is the situation? Back in 1995 Bishop Alexis Bilindabagabo, Anglican bishop of Gahini near Kigali, visited Australia for the first time. Many times during that tour he spelled out in churches, community meetings and media interviews what were for him the basic steps in reconciliation of any country after the trauma of civil war or genocide:

1 You have to take off your mask.
2 Identify the real problems: mind and heart have to be in accord.
3 Give up a ‘must win’ attitude.
4 Lay down the possible alternatives.
5 Choose the best alternative and agree on it.
6 Make sure you communicate in a way which doesn’t offend anyone.
7 Make sure you carry in your minds personal relationships.

Courtesy -Communication from Dev Ratnam

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | மறுமொழியவும்

The Party of the Dead

Bar Man

Noel Nadesan
The heading is taken from the Russian novelist Fyodor Dostoyevsky’s masterpiece ‘The House of the Dead’. This novel speaks about a hard labor prison in Siberia and is an ideal tool in my depiction of the principal Tamil party and its character at this juncture.
The Tamil National Alliance (TNA) took a decision not to participate at the 19th
session on human rights in Geneva – one of the wisest steps taken by the party in its long and chequered history. After all, how can a political party work against its own country in a world forum? Could we imagine the American Republican Party or the British Labor party campaigning against their own country in the United Nations even though they disagree with their government of the day? Political parties disagree and dispute with the party of the government, but the dirty linen should not be washed in a world forum.
However, the TNA member M. A. Sumantiran’s effigy was burned at the Jaffna University by extreme elements that are part of the LTTE rump still active in the pores of civil society. This type of action has been supported by people who were expelled from the TNA during the last parliamentary elections. As soon as this act occurred, the Leader of the TNA, Mr. Rajavarothayam Sampanthan, MP, started wetting his pants and wrote to all the members of the human rights council to support the American draft solution on the question of
accountability of the last days of the war in Sri Lanka.
The Tamil leadership at present is at the lowest level in our sixty year history.
The elimination of Tamil leaders by the LTTE during the last 30 years has created a leadership vacuum among the North- East Tamils. Since the LTTE
evaporated three years ago, the TNA has pushed to fill this vacuum.
Who is this TNA?
The TNA, like the cocktail Bloody Mary, is Tomato juice, Vodka, Horseradish, Lemon, lime, Worcestershire sauce, pepper, and salt.
Who is the bar man?
During the time of the LTTE, pursuing instructions from the Liberation Tiger leader Prabaharan; D. Sivaram manufactured the TNA from many different elements. D Sivaram, however, had emerged from the Peoples’ Liberation Organisation of Tamil Eelam (PLOTE) in the 1980s and then became a journalist. Given his militant background, he was able to write
and analyze the armed struggle from a different angle. His writing
was popular not only among Tamils but also among the Sinhalese. He
too was targeted by the LTTE killers but later became one of their
beloved men. Indeed, he was posthumously crowned as a Mahmanithar by the LTTE leader, Prabaharan.
Though Sivaram was a good wordsmith in Tamil and English, he was hardly
a man of ethics and principles. He also enjoyed self-aggrandizement and was happy to engage in the task of king-making. He enjoyed manufacturing this Tamil alliance because he got the instructions from the strongest Tamil leader on earth at that time. All the members of the TNA
were variously under rendition by the LTTE already. A senior leader was threatened at gun-point and forced to join; one MP’s jeep-driver was an LTTE intelligence man. Eventually, most of the members voluntarily surrendered their integrity and joined this process. So this TNA was a Bloody Mary mixed by D. Sivaram as bar man.

Prapaharan took this decision because he needed some parliamentary representation during the ceasefire. The LTTE needed pliable people. With vote rigging, they were able to send the maximum number of representatives to the Sri Lankan parliament. Only one man resisted this process, namely, Mr Ananthasankari . Not that he was politically opposed to Tamil unity. Rather,
because Anathasankari is a very proud man, he could not be a yes man to the
LTTE, so he rebelled.
During its last days as a militarized state regime, when the LTTE was herding the people to the war front as cannon fodder, not one member of the TNA could raise his voice for the people because to do so would earn the wrath of the LTTE. Only Mr. Anathasankari was able to raise his voice for those people because he was, and is, his ‘own man.’
Elimination of the LTTE, lack of vision from pro-Government Tamil parties and desire of the Sri Lankan Government to demonstrate that democracy had been restored to the North and East, presented a gift to the TNA to become the main representative of the Tamil population of the Northern and Eastern provinces. But, it is not certain whether the TNA was prepared to handle the responsibility or accountability that went along with that position.
They began with a big historical blunder by supporting Sarath Fonseka
against the President Rajapakse in the Presidential Elections. However, on this occasion the ordinary Sinhala peasants saved not only Sri Lanka, but also the Tamil community by rejecting that choice. I can recall what Robert Knox said: once “you have washed the mud from the Sinhala farmer he can be king”
After recovering from their blunders, the TNA is now being manipulated by many
elements who have no interest of the ordinary Tamil people in their
heart. A small body of people expelled from the TNA is showing they are more
Tamil nationalist than Velupilai Prabaharan, while the Sri Lankan
Tamil daily papers today look worse than the tabloids printed by the LTTE
because these papers are trying to appease the diaspora element. We can
see the transnational government led by Rutharakumar (it is very
surprising a rebel government is able to function from the American soil –
the last rebel leader supported by America was Mr Jonathan Savambi
from Angola) also having dialogue with some elements in the TNA. I am sure
Nediyavan and Tamilnet group are also working along this path.
The TNA is a party without any proper policy and principle. It is therefore a
fertile hunting ground for those diaspora elements who want to put their fingers
not only into Tamil affairs, but also into Sri Lankan affairs. Internationalizing the Sri Lankan problem is counterproductive to the Tamils living in Sri Lanka. It is easier for the expatriates because they do not have to face the consequences of their action.
Note too that most of the TNA members have parked their families abroad.
We can learn from history: after the Indo-Lanka Accord of 1987, India with 120,000 military personnel could not solve the political problems in Sri Lanka. That action promoted the JVP rebellion. Many thousands were killed on both sides and the Tamil problem became more complex. My honest feeling is that while the men who manufactured the TNA are dead, this political party has many Zombies who are bent on self-destruction and are eventually going to lead the Tamil people to conditions that are not far different from Mullivaikal.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 மறுமொழிகள்

UNHRC’s resolution ,counter-productive

By Panduka Senanayake
“Sri Lanka is a sovereign country and should be allowed to find its own long term and permanent solution to its ethnic problem without outsiders, forcing their will on the country,” said Veterinary Surgeon Noel Nadesan of Victoria commenting on the 23 March passage through the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva of the resolution on “Promoting reconciliation and accountability in Sri Lanka.
Mr.Nadesan, from Sri Lanka’s ethnic minority Tamil community migrated to Australia in early 1987 and operates a successful veterinary practise. He edited and published a Tamil fortnightly newspaper and has written four books, one of which has been translated into English, on his experiences as a vet. Copies of his newspaper had been burnt and he had been threatened over his moderate views by detractors. Following the conclusion of Sri Lanka’s conflict, Mr.Nadesan has built a small hospital at his own expense in the island of Eluvaitivu, his birthplace, in the country’s north.
He was confident of Sri Lanka finding its own home grown solution to the problem and said the Sri Lanka government has the power and the mandate from the people to do it. He said that the government has to have a proper long term plan on devolution and decentralisation of power, economy and culture.
He pointed out that the UNHRC’s resolution would turn out to be counter-productive because the US which brought the resolution, and its supporters were trying to foist their own solution on Sri Lanka. He said that placing a time frame during which the country has to show to UNHRC, the progress it has made on implementing steps on accountability and reconciliation indicated a lack of trust on the Lanka government.
“Further, this would be considered a high handed act by some of the Sinhala nationalists. Since they cannot take on the mighty USA, they will hold the Tamils in the island responsible for this. Instead of bringing the two communities closer, this would drive the wedge further between them, “he said.
Asked if the time frame was placed to prevent the SL government from shirking its responsibilities and avoid accountability Mr.Nadesan was derisive. “It is a joke for America of all countries to speak of accountability. They do not wish to be accountable and do not sign the international covenants that would hold their soldiers responsible for violations of human rights in action around the globe; but here they want to subject a small country, which fought a 30 year conflict against terrorism, accountable,” he said.
Of the accusation of `war crimes’ leveled against soldiers, Mr.Nadesan said that war brutalised people and this happened in all wars and all involved parties were responsible for the escalation of violence throughout the years . While it is difficult for the people affected, we should move on, he said.
However, highlighting some action of the soldiers towards the end of the fighting by some groups with vested interest was laughable he said. If these groups cared at all, they should have done so from the beginning he said pointing out the attack and killing of prisoners at a Sri Lankan jail in 1987. There were many such incidents but none of these champions of human rights spoke out then, he pointed out.
Stating that the country’s own action on the Lessons Learnt and Re-conciliation Committee (LLARC) report to find solutions for a home grown solution was progressing he pointed out the rehabilitation and de-mining activities in the north-east have progressed very well.
He pointed out that the Tamil people of Sri Lanka will have to learn to live with the 81 percent of majority Sinhalese. Any one from outside who does not intend living in the country should not try to force a solution on that country. Supporters of the resolution should not only talk about it but put money on the table and assist Sri Lanka to develop he said.

Posted in Uncategorized | மறுமொழியவும்

In search of Saviors

Channel 4 and Never-ending Quest by Tamils

George R. Ckrhushchev

Everytime diaspora tamils go behind some shepherd to be herded to ‘still waters and green pastures’, the first thing comes to my mind is “Here we go again!”.

Tamils have a long history of being sheep in desperate need of shepherds. The jaffna tamil society, which never hesitates to boast its pride on its ‘educated jaffna’ badge of honor, from time to time, decides to follow one leader or another. Once it chooses its leadership and on its way, there is no place for alternative opinions. Long before Dubya uttered those words, Jaffna was following it. You are either with us or with them. The battle cry is always ‘we have to stick together’.

A society that still doesn’t want to shed its caste system, facing the enemy, real or imaginary, will talk about unity, without any shame. Anyone straying will be black sheep.

Traitor.

It will question your patriotism, even your bloodline. One who doesn’t have tamil blood.

Your mother would be rolling in her grave, hearing those accusations about her chastity.

That is nothing new. Sheep accusing other sheep about their color. No big deal!

The problem is what it does with its shepherds. In tamil parlance, there is no such thing as opposition leader. Yes, there are traitors, quislings, boot lickers and tail waggers. But there can never be an opposition leader.

There is nothing wrong with that, you might say. You gotta give credit where its due. It is every ethnic group’s dream to get people united, under one banner, like that. They should learn from tamils. We wish we had leaders and society like that.

I hear ya!

Well, You should have seen what they did to their leaders, once they failed to lead them to the promised lands… pastures and still waters. Without blinking an eye, they were branded traitors. They are neither grateful of their leaders’ convictions and sacrifices nor ashamed in following such a traitorous leader.

As if nothing happened, after crucifying the current leader at the lamp post, they will follow the next. More than 100 years of tamil political history is littered with the heads of these leaders. Ramanathan, GG Ponnambalam, Amirthalingam, Mahathaya, Karuna… You name it. We have plenty of long time leaders turned traitors overnight. Now it is Sampanthan and Sumanthiran Duo, for failing to go to Geneva.

One might wonder how El Supremo escaped wrath of tamils, despite surrendering to the very military he was hellbent on fighting. More on that later.

 

Desperate measures for desperate times

In the post-Mullivaiakaal era, having lost their one and only leader, diaspora tamils are in dire straits, looking for anyone to lead them to… where else… the promised land.

It started with KP, once-pariah-turned-savior-turned-traitor-now. He was sidelined once, if not expelled. Once he was officially anointed as heir apparent by our Great Leader, all was forgiven and forgotten. His fifteen minutes of fame came to an abrupt end, when he was betrayed by his own… bundled, shipped and delivered from Malaysia to Sri Lanka. The seasoned negotiator made himself comfortable in the inner sanctum of the dynasty.

How dare he not take cyanide?

As usual, he became a traitor. They even floated a theory that he self-staged that drama. I couldn’t stop scratching my head ever since.

Then they came up with that so-called government in exile. Elections held, leaders (s)elected. Naturally, tamils being tamils, there were factions and an acrimonious split. Now suddenly both camps became traitors. Who is traitor or savior is anybody’s guess. Now everyone hasn’t stopped scratching his head as to who the traitor-of-the-day is. Technically tamils are torn between the unholiy trinity… Prime minister, Tall man and the Reverend. Honestly, I don’t have a clue as to where that former intelligence impostor, Vinayagam, belongs. So for the time being, tamils, collectively, haven’t made up their mind about their treason.

But you know tamils never give up their search for shepherds. Then came the campaign to send their representative to… where else… Canadian parliament. Despite previous failed attempts at various lower level governments, this time powers that be in the tamil community mobilised the now-defunct tiger machinery in action.

A star is born. Or was created.

Rathika Sitsabaiesan was at the front and centre of the tamil community. A female version of our national leader was projected. It should be every tamil’s historic noble duty to send our own daughter to canadian parliament, tamils were told.

She is going to win Tamil Ealam in Rouge (red) Valley, whereas our national leader lost Ealam and made another river, Mulli vaikaal, rouge.

Here we go again. First thing came to my mind is “For how long?”. It wouldn’t take them long to call her “traitor”.

She became a household name and guest, attending birthday bashes. At least, she is down to earth, not down-in-earth, hiding in a bunker.

As my friend deadpanning me often, there are more than thirty people who claim to have engineered her victory single-handedly.

Contrary to conventional wisdom, she won, not because of tamils’ overwhelming support. Her victory was made possible only by Late Jack Layton’s Orange wave and some dubious tactics employed by her backers who were able to fool the canadian electoral system. Their exploits got coverage in canadian mainstream media and those backers are nowhere to be seen nowadays.

Tamils made history by electing one of their own. But you never know tamils might make another history for their contribution in making stiff canadian electoral laws, if they hadn’t already done with immigration and insurance laws. It wouldn’t be long before canadian electoral officers dipping your fingers in ink a la homeland elections.

Look at the bright side. Wouldn’t it be nice to flip your stained bird?

Inflated expectations of her hoisting the tiger flag in Parliament Hill deflated so fast that now she became a persona non grata to tamil movers and shakers, if you call those in suits, grinning widely at the photo-ops with canadian politicians, as such.

Those who don’t know the canadian political realities might entertain the idea that she is the representative of tamil diaspora and tamils in Ealam. But, as far as canadians are concerned, she is no more than a representative of Rouge Valley constituents. Of NDP, that is.

“I heard it through the grapewine” that now she is unofficially a traitor and there are moves underway to make her a ‘one-term-wonder’.

You never know, next time she might be the one accusing electoral fraud against these same tamil elites. Well, you can call it ‘sour grapes’.

You can still make grapewine out of sour grapes. Can’t you?

Drinking that wine will be like tasting your own medicine.

 

Well, what do all these have to do with that Channel 4 doc?

After the first installment of Killing Fields, tamils started believing Channel 4 is in their side. Humiliated by the decimation of Tigers and their beloved leader’s death, they were calling for the head of Rajapakse. They are ready to go behind anyone who spearheads that call. That’s where Channel 4 fits in. You should have seen in the tamil media, how the Channel 4 was tigerized… er… lionized.

Overnight Channel 4 became a savior.

Then it hit me a again with a question… For how long? History being my teacher as it is to our beloved National leader, it wouldn’t be that long.

Let them face judgement day!

I have nothing against the intent or content of Killing Fields. Without question, what happened to those prisoners of war are war crimes. Not just human rights violations. Those who were raped, maimed and killed could have been our own sisters, mothers and daughters. Those who were blindfolded and shot could have been our brothers or sons. It doesn’t matter even if it is a child of a monster, who dragged children for slaughter. Perpetrators who committed these crimes against humanity and caused this heart wrenching human tragedy should be brought to justice.

Channel 4 should be credited for bringing the suffering of the innocent to the forefront to get the attention it really deserves.

No one should be defending the SL government on any grounds to get it off the hook. It is the government’s job to get out the mess of its own making and pay the price. Fighting terrorism doesn’t give licence to kill innocents or unarmed prisoners of war. The war couldn’t simply be portrayed as a humanitarian rescue operation from the clutches of tigers. The all out war to wipe out tigers can’t be waged without giving any regard of civilian casualities, or by simply claiming that all those killed are only terrorists.

Yes, there are big boys who don’t obey those rules which they are imposing on small fry. That is neither justification nor excuse.

It is the SL government’s duty to come clean by bringing those perpetrators to justice. Were it fails, it is the collective duty of international community to step in to get to the bottom of it. As it is done everywhere.

This is every tamil’s wish.

Wish if it were that simple.
Hang him, not release him!

Problem with diaspora tamils is that all these theatrics are more to do with ‘Hang him!’ than peaceful resolution of tamil ethnic question, nor even getting justice to those who suffered. It is all about getting even for being humiliated. Getting revenge. Eye for an eye. Blood for Blood. It is nothing else.

Going back to my theory about our leaderships, tamils committed their cardinal sin of investing. Failure of diversification. Putting all eggs in one basket.

They put all their hopes in one single person, believing he is the only one capable of delivering the goods. How a society that was proud of its ‘universtiy-educated’ heritage was able to go behind one who hadn’t even finished his grade 8 education is beyond me. In the tradition of worshipping the matinee idols of tamil cinema, they were cheering our “Thambo” who would singlehandedly “kill’em all and let god sort’em out”, and get Tamil Ealam, not to mention rescuing thousands of ‘tamsels’ in distress. As the credits roll, he would sing, riding a white horse… “Prabaharan’s army will win”.

Living in their fantasy world for a long time and being cut off from reality by believing their own propaganda, tamils all over bought the hype sold by Tigers and their war profiteers.

The revealation came in Mulli Vaikaal that their leader is just another mere mortal, who is afraid of his own life, like every one else, not a fearless warrior, as he was projected to be, who would fight until his last drop of blood, crying ‘freedom’ like “Braveheart” William Wallace.

The ‘Bravadoheart’, was living in his own fantasy world, like his moronic followers, believing he would get ‘Arafat’esque treatment, when surrendering. And he was waiting to be air-lifted like Marcos, in front of international media.

How else can you explain his dyed hair, combat fatigues, pistol and his dog tag?
Put all eggs in one basket, have eggs on your face!

Yes, the reality hit them very hard. After mercilessly killing anyone that was perceived as a traitor who betrayed the cause, their own leader betrayed them. After spreading the myth that tigers would rather take cyanide than being caught alive, he was afraid of his own life and kneeled down to his captors.

The man who sent hundreds of suicide bombers and tens of thousands of cadres for slaughter, without any shame, surrendered.

This is the man who used his own people as human shield, and killed those trying to escape with white flags and eventually he surrendered with a whitel flag.

The man who proudly gave posthumous awards for great heroes, was shamelessly afraid of his life and became the greatest coward.

For tamils, the myth exploded right on their face, leaving them naked with their stupidity. Only way to save their face is living in denial. All these years, when they branded their leaders as traitors, there was somebody else waiting in the wings to take on the mantle. Not this time. Because they were cheering when he mowed down all those political leaders.

They put all eggs in one basket, now all had eggs on their faces.

Despite graphic evidence of their leader’s demise, they wanted to pretend that their leader is alive.

In the jungle. Eritrea. White house. Somewhere.

They pretended so, not because he is alive, only because accepting the truth will make them look greatest fools.

They repeated, He will come back!

Of course, He will!

I am a christian and we christians are waiting for 2000 years for Him to come back.

He never came and we never gave up hope!

While telling everyone that their leader is alive, they were frantically looking for someone, just anyone, who could carry the torch… or the AK47.

Can you imagine that if he were alive, he would tolerate such a traitorous act?

Yes, there were leaders, but they were no match to our Great Leader. All of them surrendered their self-respect in the altars of Wanni by proclaiming to tigers that we are one and the same. As there is no credible tamil leadership forthcoming, head hunting went beyond ealam tamils. Without even blinking, they were ready to jump in bed with anyone.

Yes, politics make strange bedfellows. But unprincipled bed hopping like this has another street name. And I have more respect for sex workers.

It became so pathetic that even Mary Colvin became a celebrated tamil martyr.

It came to the lowest point when they even backed Sarath Fonseka in presidential elections, who boasted about killing Prabaharan and claimed, as immigrants, tamils have no rights, so they should shut up. This is the same Sarath Fonseka, whom tamils wanted to get arrested on war crimes while he was in US.

How low can you go?

 

Sleeping with enemies

Human Rights Watch, which was not long ago disparaged by tamils for condemning tiger recruitment of child soldiers, suddenly became a darling. So did Amnesty International.

Overnight Jeyalalitha became the “mother of ealam’, even though for time immemorial she was called names unprintable. Karunanithi became a hero, just for writing letters to the prime minister or press releases, even though tamils cursed him in his collusion with the central government during the final stages of the war.

US imperialists who were conspiring to destroy tamils’ aspirations and its national leader and cursed for not air lifting their leader, became the one-and-only hope with its current stance at UNHRC.

It all comes down to this: Say something what they want to hear. You can be their savior. Say something about the human rights violations of tigers. Next moment, they will be calling for your blood. Not to worry. Then say something bad about SL government. Everything will be forgiven and forgotten. You will be in their good books and you are allowed to retake the throne.

Like any drowning man, tamils wanted to hold on to anything within reach. There came Channel 4.

Hold on they did!
Crusading journalists

I have no qualms about crusading journalists. Fighting for justice while reporting the facts is an honorable thing. It breaks my heart reading about journalists being killed by dictators and drug cartels. I always wonder whether it is worth giving the precious life for something you believe in. Yes, it is better than being a coward, who wanted save his own life by surrendering after sacrificing hundreds of thousands of others.

But, there is a line any journalist should not cross. That is, taking one side and justifying its wrongs.

Nobody has any illusion about Murdoch’s Mad Men at Fox. Those crusaders are hell bent on bringing down Obama, not because they believe in small government and trickle down economics. It is simply because they want to line the pockets of big fat cats who fund them. These crusaders of ‘Tax cut to the rich’ are just tools of right wing neocon propaganda.

No one will cry foul at the arrests of Murdoch’s phone hacking fleet street journos at News of the World as an assault on press freedom either.

Patron saint of tamils, Mary Colvin, defended America’s war on Iraq and repeatedly said “we’ve gotten rid of him”, without saying Saddam by his name.

Is she a crusading journalist or a relentless war monger? In her own words… “Our mission is to report these horrors of war with accuracy and without prejudice. We always have to ask ourselves whether the level of risk is worth the story.” She took great risks, and lost her life, ‘to report the horrors of war with accuracy and without prejudice’.

She was in Wanni without government’s authorization, lost her eye and, at the end, was trying to save tiger leadership.

But for her, were the children dragged from the clutches of their mothers and got slaughtered not a story? Did she bother to write anything about the political assassinations, that robbed tamils of alternative leadership?

Or did she simply get cozy with tigers to look away the horrors of war, perpetrated by them?

And she even came close to saving them. If she had ever succeded in it, would she have called for a war crimes tribunal for tiger leaders?

Like all these journalists, Channel 4 crossed that line. Instead of presenting the facts and letting others do the leg work, it became a crusader on behalf of tiger-backing tamils, exiled sinahalese journalists and, god only knows, who else?

Of those human rights violations and war crimes committed by Tigers, Channel 4 mentions in passing, just to defend its journalistic integrity.
You can only play the clips you’re dealt!

Yes, they can only show what they get from the sources.

That’s the point. Who gave them? What are their intentions? What did they choose to show… and hide?

Did Channel 4 try to get the full picture?

Any journalist, who tries to cover a controversial subject, will try to get the other side of the story, even if they are outright lies. Yes, Sri Lankan government has its share of ‘Comical Ali’s, whose utterings are an insult, not only to intelligence, but to common sense.

Most of those generals, who fought the war, got diplomatic postings. As they are in foreign soil, it would’nt have been hard to track them down and chase them with cameras.

I haven’t even seen anything like, ‘Calls for comments were never returned’. It looked like Channel 4 started with an agenda. When someone is determined about the answer, the questions they ask never matter.

Like tamils, Channel 4 was sucked into the theatrics.

 

Old sambar in new banana leaf
Actually, the second installment didn’t offer anything new. The footage of Prabaharan was in Army’s website for a while, right after the end of the war, before taken down. Photos of his killed son was making rounds in the internet for some time. There isn’t anything earth shattering. There is no new evidence. May be for Channel 4, not for us anyway.

It was old recycled material! It is just old sambar in new banana leaf!

Eager to get attention and ratings, it was using the timing to coincide with UNHRC sittings. Perhaps, those who provided the footage insisted on it. Or simply Channel 4 had its own agenda.

Unanswered questions

After seeing the first Killing Fields, there were few questions in my mind that I was waiting for anyone to ask. So far, no one did.

 

My first question was this: In the last presidential elections, if Sarath Fonseka had won, would these crusaders have pursued these accusations with such a passion?

I don’t think so. First, Sarath Fonseka’s candidacy got the blessings and backing of powers that be. You might say that Mahinda and his siblings would have been brought to justice in the Hague.

Well. Wouldn’t it have opened the can of worms and implicated the general himself? Of course, he would have thrown the brothers in jail without even blinking an eye, only on the grounds of corruption. But Nobody would have bothered about the war crimes.

Then comes the next question: Wasn’t he the man who spearheaded this military campaign… successfully? Wasn’t he the man who insisted on appearing on tv to announce the victory to the nation? Wasn’t he trying to take all the credit for the war and victory? Then, where were the accusations about his complicity? Is it just the Rajapakse clan they are after? Why is it all about Rajapakses only? Isn’t it selective justice?

Third question is, would it have been the same with a UNP government? Of course, UNP and its perennially losing leader would have stopped the war, even before they reached tamil ealam’s capital, bowing to outside pressure and prolonged the war.

And thank god, for sparing us from being forced to watch the theatrics of Wanni now.

Problem with the powers that be is that they want puppets and pawns. Their selective love of human rights, as it was theirs of the Kuwaiti people in the first gulf war, always make people wary of their intentions. If the war was waged by UNP, and won, all these hoopla would have just been brushed aside as a terrorist problem.

So is it the regime change they are after? Why? Would it solve the ethnic issue? History taught us that even though tamils are always happy to hop in bed with UNP, it is a chamaleon which will never do justice to the tamil people. If tamils are in this predicament as we are now, it is because of the policies of none other than the great fox, JR Jeyawardena. He was the one who declared war on tamils even before the militancy was in its infancy. He was the one who charted the course, where tamils were put to collide with India, an irreparable damage that still haunts tamils today. When, Chandrika, with the help of Neelan Thiruchelvam, against all odds, decided to introduce a solution package, didn’t UNP torpedo it with the help of Tigers and TNA?

So if we really need a regime change, and bring UNP to power, for whose interests?

Tamils’ interests? Not that I know of! If I were to believe that all these are done in love for tamils, then I have to believe that Dubya’s love is only for Iraqi people, not for oil.

 

Where is waldo?

In the final stages of the war, there were three hundred thousand civilians trapped in an incredibly shrinking territory. The government was telling the people to move to the no-fire zone. Innocents who moved there, believing they would be safe, were slaughtered by relentless shelling. Even hospitals, schools, temples and churches where people found refuge weren’t exempted.

No one disputes these facts. All blur when figuring out whether these are causes or effects.

In a tiny strip of land, there were three hundred thousand people and they were bombarded, Channel 4 and others say.

My last question is:

Where were the tigers?

There were thousands of them. In Channel 4′s film, they are nowhere to be seen. Was it that tigers were in a separate strip of land, separate from people, carrying on their fight? No, they were among the people and they haven’t ‘silenced their guns’ yet. They kept on fighting while among the people. Then what do you expect? Precision-guided munitions that west boasts about in its usage in its wars on terrorism?

Channel 4 goes on to show that it is only civilians are in those makeshift hospitals. Where are the injured tigers? Channel 4 cleverly avoided showing tigers in any footage. Or those who gave those clips didn’t bother to.

Isn’t it a war crime to hold people against their will in a war, let alone using them as human shields? Isn’t it a war crime to use no-fire zone as a launching pad for any attacks?

The fact of the matter is tigers were using people as cover, with no regards of their lives. Because they win both ways. If they could kill the enemy, that is good. If people are dead, that is good too, they can use it for propaganda purposes.

That was clearly shown in the first instalment, when a woman in the bunker, taking cover from aerial bombardment, was screaming while being filmed “Why are you filming? What are you going to do by filming?”. She was telling the person who was filming to take cover, but that person kept on. Her screaming was going on… ‘ioh, they are going to kill us all’.

This is what it is all about. For tigers, it is all about propaganda. They purposedly filmed the people’s suffering.

Yes, there are many all over the world, risking their lives filming the misery, because they believe that it will bring attention and needed help. But for tigers, it is all about saving themselves, because they are the ones causing that misery.

So the clips about tamil civilians Channel 4 got in its hands are filmed by tigers and those who were affliated to tigers. And their sole intention was propaganda. That’s why tigers are nowhere to be seen. If it was done by independent people, we would have seen tigers mingling with people, including in hospitals.

We still hear stories from the survivors that how tigers were using artilleries in the proximity of those hospitals. They have thousands of stories about their suffering under the hands of tigers. There are stories of tiger cadres running away with people.

Yes, you can’t convert the non-believers who will never believe what they don’t want to believe. Tell them about the stories of ordinary people. They will say it is all government propaganda or people are still under government control. Or all of them are traitors.

The trophy videos about military atrocities were mostly provided by sinhalese journalists and military personnel. But some in tamil circles claim that they had to pay handsome amount to get them. What an innovative idea to extract money from the intelligent diaspora!

It was the sinhalese who brought these videos, that depict the atrocities committed by sinhalese army, out to get the attention. But tamils are still trying to cover up the atrocities, done by tigers.
Reap what you sow!

Make no mistake. All these questions don’t absolve sri lankan government of its atrocities, war crimes and crimes against humanity. But one can not expect mercy from his enemy, once he wages a war against him. Unless he shows mercy for his enemy, he has no right to expect either. Remember the time tigers were parading the dead soldiers. Then how could you get angry when army was parading the dead bodies in A’pura air base attack? We shouldn’t be shocked to see the way prisoners of war were killed, if we care to remember the surrendered policemen, and sinhalese settlers, killed in the east. Seeing the indiginties to dead female soldiers rightfully causes outrage, but remember it was the tigers who dug out a corpse and burnt it with tires.

When the dead LTTEers were paraded in A’pura, a sinhalese catholic bishop condemned that brabaric act. I am yet to see another prominent tamil condemning such an act by tigers.

We reap what we sow! And we did well!

And we can not pretend like clueless innocents.
How Channel 4 fell from grace?

Well, Channel 4 did what it intended to do. Unfortunately for tamils, and beyond too. That’s where their honeymoon with Channel 4 came to an end.

Tamils were thinking that Channel 4 will only be exposing government atrocities. When the word got out that their leader’s demise also would be shown, came the uproar. They are ok with a sinhalese government showing their leader’s dead body. They can always deny it and believe the hollywood-computer -grahpic spinning by Nakkeeran, a supermarket tabloid from Tamil Nadu. But they don’t want a white man to show it. It was going to give credibility.

Now the tiger, a cat that is, is out of the bag, they were dumbfounded as to what to do. Tiger media was desperately in damage control mode, blaming traitors for providing the footage. Those who made a living by telling that their leader is in Eritrea, had to come up with stories. One spinmeister went as far as to minimise the damage by saying that the leader was taken alive only after being gassed.

You know a real leader will never surrender at his own free will. He saved tamil pride by surrendering only after being gassed.

Another brilliant one quoted an astrologer, who was supposed to be the one foretold Chandrika’s victory, saying the Dear Leader is alive.

Channel 4 betrayed tamils by showing the dead, and naked, body of their leader to the whole world to see. Now tamils are not that keen to show the doc to anybody.

This is how Channel 4 fell from grace, in good books of tamils .

Channel 4′s betrayal didn’t hurt the tamils that much, as US has filled in, right away, to become the savior-of-the-day. As the sole superpower took on their cause, and mission accomplished, tamils no longer need the services of Channel 4 anymore.

For the time being, they are following Uncle Sam. Once they realise that all the hoopla about the UNHRC resolution mean nothing and won’t get Mahinda to the Hague like Milosevic and Charles Taylor, they will go back to their rhetoric about US imperialists. India will have no choice but to back SL government to keep China out of Sri Lanka. Then they will restart their cursing of indian politicians.
If tamils ever want to get out of the hell hole they dug themselves into, they have to stop looking up the sky for saviors. There is no almighty who can crack open the skies and thunder ‘let there be ealam’.

They have to come out of the herd mentality of blindly following shepherds. Instead of looking for saviors and shepherds, first of all, tamils have to search for the answers by looking inwards and start questioning, why it all went wrong.

They should stop blaming others, from India to EU, from UN to US, and from Akashi to Solheim for their own failures and start taking responsiblity for their own actions.

At one point, they may realise that known devils are better than unknown gods and they are better off dealing with the devil himself than praying for the gods in heaven.
(I have no hope that they will ever do that. I don’t give up on believing in tamils that they will never give up their search for saviors.

If they ever run out saviors, there is always MIA.

This pure tamil-blooded warrior is always there, waiting, for your taking. She was the only one, in her words, talking about the suffering of tamils at international level. And she has the required attitude, looks and connections, matrimonially that is.

If tamils ever get her as a savior, tamils will get a leader they deserve and she will get the attention she craves. If tamils ever succeed in getting her to lead them, can anybody ask the two questions I have?

I would like to know how much this bleeding heart gave to the refugees in Wanni, even if it is tax-induced philanthropy.

And, after marrying into the opposing camp, whether she is still ‘like PLO I don’t surrendo’.

But, be forewarned that you being tamils, when you become disillusioned with her and make her a traitor, don’t complain, when she shows you the finger, and curses you and your mother.)

 

Post Script

It is a tragedy that in modern civilization, one can not express her opinion freely without being issued a fatwa.

Say something about Mid-East or Balkan politics. Mutter anything about fundamentalists, be it Bible-thumping-Quran-burning Southern variety or Quran-thumping-Bible-burning Mid-Eastern variety.

Express your opinion on any conflict, be it cultural, ethnic, political or religous. Without fail, you will be branded as a traitor, infidel or turncoat by one group or another.

When it comes to Tiger politics, oh brother, trust me, you ain’t seen nothin’ yet!

Suddenly, your right to exist in this world is questioned and there is someone who is ready to be a martyr by removing you from the face of the earth… along with him.

Someone somewhere wants you dead. Dons, warlords and turbanned clerics will send their enforcers with pistols and holy warriors with suicide vests. You could be blown by a suicide bomber or burnt at the stake by Fox news and Rush Limbaugh.

If you aren’t that famous, then there are millions of comment-thumping cyberwarriors whose sole raison d’etre is to leave anonymous comments and… threats.

Imagine yourself, at the Perly Gates waiting anxiously to be condemned to burn in hell for eternity by this particular God, remember hell hath no fury like a god blasphemied, while someone is jumping the queue, being greeted by 72 scantily clad virgins, adorning garlands, singing “Aloha, Welcome to paradise”.

So the conventional wisdom suggests that I should rather keep my mouth shut, run with the sheep and settle for… at least one virgin. Even if she is in Niqab.

So much for the First Amendment and freedom of speech.

So when the second installment of Channel 4′s Killing Fields was aired, as you might have understood by now, my choice was clearly, and severely, limited between hell for eternity and paradise with a niqab-clad beauty.

But now every Tom, Dick and Harry, not to mention every Raja, Kumar and Nathan along with every Singhe, Nayake and Pakse, expressed his stance on that, for sure, paradise should have run out of its supply of virgins by now, scantily clad or niqab clad.

In the world of “you are either with us or with them” world of Dubya, sitting on the fence is no longer an option. You are not allowed to keep your opinions to yourself, like keeping your virgins inside your harem, invisible to outside world.

No matter what, you have to let your opinion known to others. Saying nothing implies you have something to hide, which means “you are with them”.

As having no choice and future lead to revolutions and springs, I, left with no option but eternal hell, hereby unveiled my beauty… er… opinion.

Opinions expressed here are mine alone and not subsidised by any government or its intelligence agency. Nor am I a member of any terrorist outfit, present or past.

Yes, there were accusations in the past about me being funded by those institutions. As it is almost a quarter of a century, the purported amount should have made me the first tamil billionaire, robbing the title from that convicted felon friend of felines, Raj Rajaratnam.

Still, accusations will fly from all directions. So anyone who is able to provide any proof of payment of any kind, upon submission of incontrovertible evidence, will be awarded “40 acres and a mule” in Wanni, the one-time paradise of Tigers and their goons in diaspora, and forever-hell for the rest of the tamils.

To any pure-tamil-blood-boiling great hero, who still wants to accompany me in my journey to paradise: please be forewarned that don’t blame me, when you see, at the Pearly Gates, any note saying, “Virgins out of stock. Please, Come back another time”.

Posted in Uncategorized | மறுமொழியவும்